Brian White wrote: > > Assuming that forking a "kamakazi" child is not an acceptable > > solution, is there some way of capturing the image of the process from > > the kernal? > > Hmmm... That's interesting. Assuming there is no library/system call > to force a core dump, I could fork a child and then make the child access > mem at 0xFFFFFFFF to cause a segfault and dump core. Would that work?
There is a library call which forces a core dump, it's abort(). -- Jens B. Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null