On Tue, May 19, 1998 at 09:36:33PM -0400, Will Lowe wrote: > > Have you changed hostnames or anything? Is smail running out of inetd or > Not lately. > > > as a daemon? > from inetd. > > > Can you telnet to localhost 25 and see the smail > > announcement? > I get "connection refused" > > > Is your hosts.allow set up correctly? > It's empty -- but I haven't changed it. All the sudden yesterday when up > upgraded some packages my smail port became unavailable. Would a new > package have bungled that up without asking?
It certainly would. This happened here too, with 3.2.0.101-4. This infuriating situation seems to happen every time there is an smail upgrade. The service is switched off as #<off># in /etc/inetd.conf, the postinst tries to start it in daemon mode but has not restarted inetd so inetd still has the port bound. It doesn't ask if you wanted to switch to daemon mode first though. Then there's no documentation on the anti-spam provided either. As soon as I get a chance I might upgrade my production system to exim. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5 CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
