On Saturday, 04 September 2004 18:54, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Most people don't encrypt mail with GPG, though they do sign with it.
> I usually see GPG-encryption in IM.  Encryption wouldn't work for
> mailing lists, either, though signing does.

In *general* encryption isn't that useful for a run-of-the-mill mailing 
list, but, encryption can be used for a mailing list in quite a few 
different effective ways depending on what the goal was.

For on simple example, if a mailing list, say, "debian-encrypted", 
decided that it only wanted, say, *currently subscribed DDs* to be able 
to read messages posted there, it could encrypt all messages sent 
through it with the verified GPG keys corresponding to the DD's e-mail 
addresses who were subscribed to it. This could be pretty easily 
accomplished with any existing mailing-list software that let's you run 
a command to pre-process messages flowing through it.

Sorry to interrupt. ;)

-- 
Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094  0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2

Attachment: pgpUyleL7J84R.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to