<#secure method=pgp mode=sign> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Craig Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My own idea is that PGP/GPG could save us all from spam and SMTP > messages being clear text in one fell swoop. If everyone encrypted their > email using GPG/PGP and refused to accept unencrypted email or mail not > encrypted with their public key, spammers would have a heck of a time > tracking all of those public keys then have to use a few CPU cycles to > encrypt before sending, not to mention a few million keys to juggle. Most people don't encrypt mail with GPG, though they do sign with it. I usually see GPG-encryption in IM. Encryption wouldn't work for mailing lists, either, though signing does. > And surely the enduser PGP/GPG software could be made easy enough to > use for the average Joe -- as in find the recipient's key, encrypt > and send-- doh. It already is. > Why do we need SPF or Madrid? For seamlessness? Heck with that. > PGP/GPG would help to actually fix a problem rather than patch one. No kidding. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBOmPDUzgNqloQMwcRAnLRAJ93xK7F4ltVCfoGaGau8RFBNHNBfgCgkpRm 5TxKwGzcj0cFlfpY6up77RM= =lNOf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
