Re: browsers: was: Console only box?

[Cheryl Homiak]

Parts of the site I could navigate and parts I couldn't, but the same 
thing happens to me with many sites with links. I said that lynx works for 
me for a lot of things, that it isn't "useless" to me.  I search, find, 
download and shop every day with lynx and, though I certainly would like 
to see javascript implemented, I can do most of what I want to do. Links2 
gets some of the javascript but it chokes in plenty of places for 
various reasons also. If you 
don't find lynx useful for your needs, I have no problem with that; you 
can use whatever you like.  People should use whatever 
they find useful for their needs. As for me, I will continue to use lynx 
and links2 and sometimes edbrowse and elinks and whatever else is out 
there, and as accessibility becomes better 
probably Mozilla, though I'd rather work in console. all of these are 
tools for me for different tasks; it isn't a matter of "proving" what's 
best for everybody. I'm not going to tell a newbie I work with NOT to use 
lynx because it's useless, and especially not a blind person; I'm going to 
present all the tools that are available and explain the strengths and 
weaknesses as I have experienced them and let the person develop his/her 
own preferences.

--
Cheryl
"Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also."

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]