Hi, On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 10:44:30AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > David Haughton wrote: > > I still prefer lynx over links (or links2 or whatever).
That is fair ... > 1: This is debian list. As such it behooves you to follow the CoC as laid out > here: <http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/>. You'll note that it states > clearly one should not CC unless requested. I did not, have not nor will not > request a CC. Please adhere to the CoC. Thanks. Relax. It ain't as bad as spam. > 2: Lynx suffers from a decided lack of formatting and frames support, links > does not. As such many pages that are completely unreadable in lynx are > perfectly usable in links. Since most people don't know about links nor its > formatting capabilities they often see lynx, see how useless it is and give up > on text browsers. Best to point them at the one that at least can render > something more than the HTML equivolent of "hello world". :P But look at bright side :) When you want to extract a content of a frame, it will be nicer to use lynx (I usually use links.) So any shortcomings may be considered feature. Just like life. We just have to make best of it. Osamu ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++ Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brussels Belgium, GPG-key: A8061F32 .''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers : :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu `. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
