I cannot do it because, the big router has a little bandwidth only used by these servers.
I try to use the office network to give internet all rest. And the second, I would have to do NAT because, each router only manages his range. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:38 PM Subject: Re: NETWORK ROUTES > 聲gel Carrasco, 2002-Oct-24 22:21 +0200: > > I have two routers because I use one for internal users and other to use > > with public internet servers. Ok? And I cannot manage or add new rules in > > these routers because they are administrated by other company. > > > > Can you help me,please? > > > > My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is: 213.250.143.242. > > > > 0.0.0.0 172.16.16.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth3 > > Try this, remove the above route and replace it with one to > 213.250.143.242: > > # route del default gw 172.16.16.254 > # route add default gw 213.250.143.242 > > and see it that fixes it. I believe my previous post is all wrong as > far as what I thought the route table should look like. I think this > is all you need to do. > > jc > > -- > Jeff Coppock Systems Engineer > Diggin' Debian Admin and User > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
