On sábado, 27 de agosto de 2016 1:52:43 A. M. ART Maximiliano Curia wrote:
[snip]
> >> At the same time it's a feature that consumes a great amount of
> >> resources, particularly if you have GBs of Mails.
> > 
> > Well this is what KDE is a about - semantic desktop funcionality. And
> > the resources are needed once to make an index. After that it is much
> > less, no? But however - in Akonadiconsole you can easily delete the
> > akonadi_indexing_agent. If this is not working properly wouldn't the
> > right way be to write a bug report for Akonadi-Console?
> 
> We have different ideas on what KDE is about, the semantic functionalities
> have a love it or hate it experience for our users, so I'm more inclined
> toward options that makes them optional.

I'm also in the hate side of this I'm afraid. Having to delete 
akonadi_indexing_agent id too much of a hack for disabling this. Having the 
necessary packages as recommendations is a much better approach.
 
> About akonadiconsole, I'm not sure if it's even considered a bug, that after
> removing the indexer, it's added back. Anyway it's been a while since I
> last tried this, the indexer is currently running in this machine.
> 
> > So please, please, please:
> > Do not do this. That's unfair to a whole lot of people who are not as
> > skilled as you in hacking. Just write a bug report for the akonadi
> > console and remove the package for your own usecase. And add it as
> > dependency.
>
> Now I feel being nagged. :) We have known about the issue not long ago, we
> added some recommends (that haven't being uploaded yet) that should improve
> the main user experience while allowing the users that hate wasting
> resources in a feature they don't use to avoid it.

That's indeed a much better solution :)

-- 

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to