severity 825689 important
thanks

Vincent: if I add that breaks then qt in unstable/testing becomes
uninstalable.

The bug is *solved* in both unstable and experimental, as both versions of
qtbase already have the fix. The real bug was an uncoordination due to us
being preparing qt 5.6 in experimental and it only affects experimental
users.

I accept the severity of this bug to be at least important,  although I
still don't think it's a bug at all, and in the worst case it was a bug in
qtbase in experimental. If you insist on this i can update qtchooser's B+R
whenenever we get to upload qt 5.6 to unstable.

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
El may 28, 2016 5:33 PM, "Vincent Lefevre" <vinc...@vinc17.net> escribió:

> Package: qtchooser
> Version: 58-gfab25f1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 7.3
>
> Despite the problem is in libqt5core5a 5.6.0+dfsg-1, the rule is that
> qtchooser should have a "Breaks" against this package.
>
> The "affects" added in bug 825243 is unfortunately not sufficient
> to make the user aware of the bug because aptitude ignores it (see
> bug 825283). Moreover reportbug ignores it too (bug 544812).
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: stretch/sid
>   APT prefers unstable-debug
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
> 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>
> Versions of packages qtchooser depends on:
> ii  libc6       2.22-9
> ii  libgcc1     1:6.1.1-4
> ii  libstdc++6  6.1.1-4
>
> qtchooser recommends no packages.
>
> qtchooser suggests no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>

Reply via email to