Hey, > looks reasonable to me. I'm assuming that in debian, we'd have the > gpgme1.0 package (maintained by pkg-gnupg-maint) take over the binary > packages from the gpgmepp souce package (maintained by the Debian Qt/KDE > maintainers). I've cc'ed both groups on this e-mail so that people are > aware of the situation.
Ah, this information is already spreading around :D That is good. Yes, Debian
Qt/KDE maintainers would have to remove KF5GpgMEpp. But if I see it correcly
we won't need to react directly and can wait till all application are switched
over to gpgmepp. We should make sure, that both can be install in paralell.
But this should be possible, because we have different namespaces.
Regareds,
sandro
PS: debian-qt-kde - is mostly a list, that is spammed by the bugs
pkg-kde-talk - is more the talk list about general topics like this one
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
