On Mon 2016-04-11 13:17:49 -0400, Andre Heinecke wrote: > I've integrated the C++ and Qt Libraries for GpgME from the KDE Initiative > as > language provider into GpgME in the branch "gpgmepp". > > I think that branch is now ready for a merge into master. > > Build can be controlled by the --enable-languages configure option. So > > --enable-languages=no > > Will build only the C library. > > GpgMEpp is a C++ wrapper / binding around GpgME closely follows the API of > GpgME itself. (Requires C++11) > > QGpgME is more of a "Qt library" to work with GpgMEpp then a binding. Has a > Job based Qt API that takes Qt data structures as gpgme data type > providers. > (Requires Qt5 and GpgMEpp) > > The API is mostly compatible with KF5GpgMEpp and KF5QGpgME which > was released as part of KDE-Applications. Small changes might be caused by > the > removal of boost classes from public API as I've ported both libraries away > from boost to c++11. > > My current plan is to no longer release KF5GpgMEpp with KDE-Applications > 16.08 > and depend on the libraries from GpgME for that release.
looks reasonable to me. I'm assuming that in debian, we'd have the gpgme1.0 package (maintained by pkg-gnupg-maint) take over the binary packages from the gpgmepp souce package (maintained by the Debian Qt/KDE maintainers). I've cc'ed both groups on this e-mail so that people are aware of the situation. --dkg