-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/13/10 23:51, Zhengpeng Hou wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Jaldhar H. Vyas <jald...@debian.org> wrote: >> Question: is ibus a complete replacement for scim at this stage? If so we >> may want to deprecate scim altogether. > yes, and I agree on this
ibus is good, but still has some issues. I think we should focus on skim and scim-qtimm only. "deprecate scim" is another topic and should be discussed with much more people that are not CCed now. I think it is better to orphan skim and scim-qtimm first, before removing them completely. skim depends on KDE3. Since KDE3 will not be supported by upstream and Debian KDE team, remove skim is much more reasonable. scim-qtimm does not depend on KDE3. There are still some Qt3 based applications that can use scim-qtimm. - -- Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb), scim-array maintainer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAktO5rYACgkQdEpXpumNYVnAtACfTvB+JqXZqWJQnI+UO9YnSgAp 9jwAni6oJ/xb9SHA4ZR9Eoj1TAwDqrMv =9CSb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
