On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Jaldhar H. Vyas <jald...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Zhengpeng Hou wrote: > >> Hi all, >> the upstream author of skim and scim-qtimm is the same one, and he hasn't >> touched this two for quite a while, from what I remember, more than 2 >> years. >> And the fact is the whole scim project is under non-maintained as well. >> Besides this, KDE 4 is being widely adopted nowadays, I'm not sure how >> many >> users will still use these two qt3/kde3 applications, just for a input >> method. >> Therefore, I proposal to remove these two from sid. >> Skim has some reverse depends, so I looped in corresponding maintainers. >> What do you guys think about it? > > I agree and we should move quickly to ensure it is done before the lenny > freeze. > > Question: is ibus a complete replacement for scim at this stage? If so we > may want to deprecate scim altogether. yes, and I agree on this > > -- > Jaldhar H. Vyas <jald...@debian.org> >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
