On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:41:43AM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:10:22AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > so, could you please: > > > (a) check what happens with other styles (to discard it being a > > style issue). Please try Keramik and Plastik, both with 'menu > > effect' enabled an disabled. > > I had tried this before sending the last email: no change at all. > > > (b) create a new system user and log in a KDE session. Add a few > > bookmarks, and check. See if adding a large amount of bookmarks > > (just start normal navigation, and press Ctrl-B for each page > > you visit) makes the delay to be present at some point. > > I did that and noticed no change in speed (it's fast). > Then, I copied the 150Ko bookmarks.xml file which caused the problem with > my normal account to the new user's account: the problem disappears, > everything is always fast as it should. > > So there's clearly a problem with my actual configuration (remember, > that it only shows in particular situations described in the bug > history) even if changing style and effects doesn't help. > If only there was a reliable way to monitor (strace would be tricky) what > konqueror exactly does within these 2.5s... maybe that would give a > hint about what's going on... Do you have an idea of how it could be > best achieved?
I've faked a new bookmark.xml full of crap (more than 500 bookmarks, 150ko big). the menu is almost instantaneous here. slowness begin to appear over 400ko-big bookmark.xml (which is rather unusable anyway. do you still have the behaviour ? if yes, could you provide your bookmark.xml please ? -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
