On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:22:24PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: Hi Pierre,
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:41:43AM +0100, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:10:22AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > > > so, could you please: > > > > > (a) check what happens with other styles (to discard it being a > > > style issue). Please try Keramik and Plastik, both with 'menu > > > effect' enabled an disabled. > > > > I had tried this before sending the last email: no change at all. > > > > > (b) create a new system user and log in a KDE session. Add a few > > > bookmarks, and check. See if adding a large amount of bookmarks > > > (just start normal navigation, and press Ctrl-B for each page > > > you visit) makes the delay to be present at some point. > > > > I did that and noticed no change in speed (it's fast). > > Then, I copied the 150Ko bookmarks.xml file which caused the problem with > > my normal account to the new user's account: the problem disappears, > > everything is always fast as it should. > > > > So there's clearly a problem with my actual configuration (remember, > > that it only shows in particular situations described in the bug > > history) even if changing style and effects doesn't help. > > If only there was a reliable way to monitor (strace would be tricky) what > > konqueror exactly does within these 2.5s... maybe that would give a > > hint about what's going on... Do you have an idea of how it could be > > best achieved? > I've faked a new bookmark.xml full of crap (more than 500 bookmarks, > 150ko big). the menu is almost instantaneous here. > slowness begin to appear over 400ko-big bookmark.xml (which is rather > unusable anyway. Like I already said, by clicking on the "Go" menu entry and dragging the mouse to the right over the "Bookmarks" entry, the "Bookmarks" menu displays instantaneously (whereas it takes 5 seconds by directly clicking on "Bookmarks"). Even more, I said that copying the bookmark file to a new user's account makes the problem disappear... > do you still have the behaviour ? if yes, could you provide your > bookmark.xml please ? ... So my problem definitely seems unrelated to the size of the file itself. As I cannot afford making my bookmarks public (it contains too many business sensitive URLs), just to be sure, would you mind providing me your "crappy" 250 Ko bookmarks.xml file instead, so I can test if I still get the same behaviour? That would be nice. Thanks, Hervé -- _ (°= Hervé Eychenne //) Homepage: http://www.eychenne.org/ v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/
