Your message dated Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:25:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Nobody sees this bug anymore?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2004 09:16:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 29 02:16:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C1Lnk-0006HC-00; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 02:16:40 -0700
Received: from spc1-cosh5-3-0-cust9.cosh.broadband.ntl.com
(borgmania.regress.homelinux.org) [81.102.80.9]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C1Lni-0002vY-00; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 04:16:38 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Grahame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kmail: Sub-Folders not highlighted as having unread mail
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:21:19 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATING,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.3.0-2
Severity: minor
Before updating to kmail 3.3.0-2 when I checked mail in if a new email was
filtered into a sub-folder, and the folder structure was collapsed, then the
top level folder would have been highlighted as having unread mail. Now
after the upgrade none of the folders or sub-folders are highlighted.
example
-------
I have the following folder structure:
Linux
Kernel
Debian
News
Bugs
Mandrake
Now previous to the update if an unread email was filtered into
Linux->Debian->News then the structure would look like this:
Linux (Bold)
Kernel
Debian (Bold)
News (1) (Bold)
Bugs
Mandrake
The (1) being the number of unread emails in the folder.
Currently the structure is not being updated to the second structure and
it's a case of pure guesswork of where there are new unread emails.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages kmail depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.0-1.1 KDE core libraries
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.1-7 GCC support library
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libkcal2 4:3.3.0-2 KDE calendaring library
ii libkdenetwork2 4:3.3.0-2 KDE Network library
ii libkdepim1 4:3.3.0-2 KDE PIM library
ii libkleopatra0 4:3.3.0-2 KDE GnuPG interface libraries
ii libkpimidentities1 4:3.3.0-2 KDE PIM user identity information
ii libksieve0 4:3.3.0-2 KDE mail/news message filtering li
ii libmimelib1 4:3.3.0-2 KDE mime library
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-7 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.3-4 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii perl 5.8.4-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-7 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 268804-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2005 09:26:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 05 01:26:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pooh.kjernsmo.net [217.77.32.186]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cm7RA-0005dk-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:26:40 -0800
Received: from ti100710a080-1500.bb.online.no ([80.213.229.220])
by pooh.kjernsmo.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1Cm7Qf-0004JG-Pg
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:26:09 +0100
From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nobody sees this bug anymore?
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:25:50 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5AA3 F2C5 FFBE A046 CEEA CB6D 944F C6A7 6A6A 0BBC
X-FOAF: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/foaf.rdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Well, I guess we'll just close it to clean up the BTS a bit, since
reporter finds it fixed and nobody else has said anything to the
contrary the last couple of months.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Astrophysicist/IT Consultant/Skeptic/Ski-orienteer/Orienteer/Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
