Hi, On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:07:18AM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Packages file is created (not sure if this will trigger an error) or > > the binary package is searched for in places like the PTS, and also > > the fact that lo-dictionaries package (currently 1:5.0.1+dfsg-1) will > > be preferred over our hunspell-ca (3.0). But this will happen > > regardless of the NEW processing ordering. I will need to add a 2: > > epoch to properly take care of this. > > We can ask for reject of our package, then re-upload without > hunspell-ca. > > @rene: What do you think?
That's what I had in mind, too. Saves Agustin a 2: epoch... Regards, Rene
