On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 06:16:14PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > After Jordi suggestion I prepared an hunspell-ca package and just > uploaded it to NEW. When looking at NEW page I noticed that a > libreoffice-dictionaries package also containing hunspell-ca was > waiting there (missed its NEW message). > > I have browsed the sources and it seems to contain the same 3.0 > version (upstream has released 3.1, but I packaged first 3.0 to make > sure PTS stuff was working properly before upgrading to 3.1), although > I am not sure that it contains variants for both Catalonia and > Valencia (sources indeed contain both). > > What do you think is better to do?
I think a dedicated package makes a lot of sense. I don't know the
policy used by TDF/LO for updating the dictionaries, but I believe you'd
be able to follow them more properly.
If you are OK with this I can just remove the hunspell-ca package from
lo-dictionaries.
(then this story will be funny because there are two packages in NEW
providing the same binary.... Guess I need to ask somebody to process
lo-dictionaries before yours, otherwise ours will overwrite yours and as
a result your package will be decrufted :P)
PS: I just pushed a ยต-change to use cgit in Vcs-Browser. The redirects
are really slow and half-broken for https...
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
