On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 06:38:14PM +0400, jaa...@ro.ru wrote: > >Wow. 42M. How much... Given broadband these days this is not an > issue... > You are not thinking of (even brand-new ones) mobile systems with > low disk space. There, it poses a definite problem: you just can't > swap a disk for a larger one!
But you can rm -rf /usr/share/doc :) You can build custom, stripped down packages (as done for udebs for the Debian installer). And no, you can buy a bigger SD card. Please don't tell me "internal memory", I don't think trying to put everything into internal memory is a good idea. > 33 times. It is a sign of a quick-and-dirty design. Abstractly I didn't do it, but I think The design is "every package has a self-contained copy of the changelog". Which is good. When you have version mismatches you always have the changelog of the right package there. Needing a strict depends on the same versions of all packages is more bad design. Same is package inflation like Ubuntu does to overcome this "bug". > this one. You might wish to forward this report to architects that > are thinking of better design decision for the future. I'm not going to do that. Grüße/Regards, René -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110630143828.gf12...@rene-engelhard.de
