On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:14:17PM +0200, Jon Lachmann wrote: > Hi again Agustin! > > Thank you for your new reply, if i build the package based of off > hunspell-en-us and get it uploaded, is there a way to make sure the > ancient myspell package gets removed in favor of the new hunspell > one? (That is, in a fresh install, so the user doesnt have to > download it himself)
I was convinced that entries in hunspell-sv control file like: Provides: myspell-sv Conflicts: myspell-sv Replaces: myspell-sv should have done the trick. However, I recently make some NMU using this for a couple of renamimgs in myspell-hr (openoffice.org-hyphenation-hr->hyphen-hr) and openoffice.org-en-au (openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-au->mythes-en-au) and noticed that this was not happening as I expected. Just noticed that using a transitional package as described in http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package may help. Rene, do you know of a better way? Otherwise I will prepare a couple of new NMUs using transitional package to smooth package renamings under myspell-hr and openoffice.org-en-au. > I will start to create the hunspell-sv package as soon as possible. Any > concerns, tips? Please look at http://dict-common.alioth.debian.org/dsdt-policy.html or at a more recent version under /usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common-dev for some generic guidelines. Regards, -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110617110012.ga3...@agmartin.aq.upm.es