[ btw, as maintainer of the package I *do* read -openoffice as that's the maintainer addrress. You don't need to Cc me in addition ]
Hi, Peter Besenbruch wrote: > > That's why this is called a workaround and no fix. > > The fix will come in rc2 I hope - upstream will fix it for 3.0.1, they > > broke it after all, and -2 was just a quick workaround to get OOo st least > > starting. > > Yes, the bug has gone from grave to just annoying, and it can be worked > around. I was offering a better work-around: the substitution of the soffice > file from 3.0. I was also reporting a flaw you might not have been aware of, > as I did not see it discussed on the list. That will be what will be in rc2 when upstream fixes it (basically). Yes, I could have reverted the cvs banch which lead to this but that would have been more invasive and confusing than this workaround (imho). > That's a given. I'm trying to help out; I am not complaining. I fully realize OK, sorry. > that the merely annoying aspects may not be fixed until new code comes from > upstream. If what I am doing isn't appropriate, please tell me, and I'll Especially as the default in the packages is still to *not* use the KDE dialog ;-) > I am getting a fair bit of work done with OpenOffice 3, both 3.0 and 3.0.1 > builds. It is stable (even with my work-around), and I like the interface Actually, I think 3.0 was not stable at all given all its regressions fixed in 3.0.1 (or even only 3.1, but...), but it's better than 3.0, yes :-) > changes. I may be imagining things, but I think 3.0.1 is faster than 3.0. Might be. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
