Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 00:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard a écrit : > Hi, > > Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > > Which is broken, too. Are we Ubuntu? no. we are Debian so the sarge > > > clause has to be in the Debian clause otherwise it has no effect because > > > on Debian the Debian clause will be used. Always. > > No, look carefully, I put it in the else clause of the 'ifeq "$(DIST)" > > "Ubuntu"'. So, if it is Ubuntu, it does not even try to check if it is > > Sarge. > > And there is no Debian clause here. > > Ah, sorry. You are right. My bad. Moved up. I must admit you made me hesitate for a few seconds...
> > I wondered to be able to help with the backport as soon as possible. > > That's why I also ask where I could get the sources in the meantime. > > Well, the backport is mainly done already with -2. > I just need to build and test it... Well, I did test it, and I found the problems I reported. Why do you feel it somewhat unuseful then? Again, I want to help, and not bother you too much, because you seem on pressure those days. ;-) Relax... > > > I am already doing one (which I can do with -2 already). Give people > > > some time to actually build/try/test it... > > I want to participate, and I will apparently use a slightly different > > one, because I will probably try to remove the dependency to KDE also. > > Why? :) Let the users decide whether they will use KDE :) Well, I would like to use it at least on a custom Debian we made (Librassoc: http://www.bxlug.be/librassoc), which is thought for quite old PC, with only GNOME. So, if I can avoid the requirements on KDElibs and some time at build, better. > That stuff is perfectly buildable on sarge; the versioned builddep just > is for forcing to built against the C++-transitioned KDE in sid. This is not the problem. > > If you could send me the latest debian/rules, I could work for myself on it. > > Well, there are already changes for -3 in there. And I don't really like > backports of unofficial/still-in-development stuff since that then > differs from the normal packages they are supposed to be backported > from. I understand, but only for me, to make me happy, hmmm? ;-) It's just to diverge the less possible from your version. I promise I will just make a diff and apply the interesting part. :-D > Regards, > > Rene
