Oops, excuse my last response! Looks like you already agree with me. Sorry--next time I'll get through the end of my mail before responding!
Adam On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:25:58AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > retitle 223304 openoffice.org-bin: one question too much in prelink debconf > question > tag 223304 minor > tag 223304 - wontfix > thanks > > Hi again, > > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Adam Kessel wrote: > > > When configuring openoffice.org-bin, the first screen contains > > > information about prelinking. At the bottom, it asks "Should > > > OpenOffice.org be prelinked?" but th only option is "Ok." Then the next > > > screen asks, "Prelink OpenOffice.org binaries?" > > > > > > Although the user eventually discovers that she will be able to answer > > > yes or no to this question, on the first screen it appears that the only > > > possible answer to the question is "Okay." > > > > This is because your screen is not "long or wide" enough. The template is > > has much text but the info given there is necessary. > > > > If the text is too long to fit on one "page" in the window, debconf does > > xactly this. > > Well, I tried it now, and see the and another problem. > > I removed one blank line to test the effect and then I got only one > dialog (because then the text apparently fits in 80x25), but with: > > [...] > > Should OpenOffice.org be prelinked? > > Prelink OpenOffice.org binaries? > > <Yes> <No> > > So removing (at least) the "Should OpenOffice.org be prelinked" > should fix this. > > I'll do that. > > Thanks for your report. > > Grüße/Regards, > > René > -- > .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer > : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ > `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 > `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 > -- Adam Kessel http://bostoncoop.net/adam
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
