debian-mips  

Messages by Date

• 2026/02/05 Bug#1127019: RM: xserver-xorg-input-keyboard [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- RoQA; This driver is for Hurd only and should not be build on Linux architecture Andreas Tille
• 2026/01/24 Bug#1126333: RM: binutils-mipsen -- RoQA; all mips* architectures removed from the archive Sebastian Ramacher
• 2026/01/21 Bug#1126132: arch-test: remove build dependency on binutils-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64 Sebastian Ramacher
• 2026/01/09 Bug#1125101: RM: xpra [armhf i386] -- RoQA; not built since 2023, still depends on pre-t64 libraries Simon McVittie
• 2025/12/31 Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet Rob Landley
• 2025/12/30 Bug#1124308: u-boot: remove gcc-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64 and gcc-mipsel-linux-gnu from Build-Depends-Indep Sebastian Ramacher
• 2025/12/18 Bug#1123577: nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64 Simon McVittie
• 2025/12/16 Bug#1123073: RM: r-cran-projpred [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Not built for 32 bit any more Andreas Tille
• 2025/12/15 Bug#1123010: RM: roct-thunk-interface [armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; limiting architecture to only amd64,arm64,ppc64el M. Zhou
• 2025/12/12 Bug#1122804: RM: r-cran-blme [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Please remove for 32 bit architectures (architecture-is-64-bit was added to Build-Depends) Andreas Tille
• 2025/12/08 Bug#1122205: RM: rhonabwy -- ROM; upstream is no longer maintained and depends on obsolete packages, FTBFS with gnutls 3.8.11 Nicolas Mora
• 2025/12/05 Bug#1121970: RM: r-cran-freetypeharfbuzz [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Please remove for 32 bit architectures (architecture-is-64-bit was added to Build-Depends) Andreas Tille
• 2025/12/04 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
• 2025/12/02 OMP fixed in the llvm-21 packaging Matthias Klose
• 2025/12/01 Bug#1121732: RM: seqan2 [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Building on 32bit architectures prevented Andreas Tille
• 2025/11/23 64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
• 2025/11/23 Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
• 2025/11/23 Re: 64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/11/23 gcc-16, first packaging bits Matthias Klose
• 2025/11/12 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Lucas Nussbaum
• 2025/11/12 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk
• 2025/11/06 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Holger Levsen
• 2025/11/05 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Lucas Nussbaum
• 2025/11/05 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Philipp Kern
• 2025/11/04 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Falco Girgis
• 2025/11/04 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) John David Anglin
• 2025/11/04 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Christopher Huhn
• 2025/11/04 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
• 2025/11/04 Re: Planned obsolescence ? Riccardo Mottola
• 2025/11/04 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Riccardo Mottola
• 2025/11/04 Re: Planned obsolescence ? Jaromír Cápík
• 2025/11/03 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner
• 2025/11/03 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
• 2025/11/03 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner
• 2025/11/03 Re: Bug#1113679: removal of mips64el, armel from Debian unstable/experimental Ansgar 🙀
• 2025/11/02 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
• 2025/11/02 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Paul Tagliamonte
• 2025/11/02 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) jbranso
• 2025/11/02 Re: removal of mips64el, armel from Debian unstable/experimental Philipp Kern
• 2025/11/01 removal of mips64el, armel from Debian unstable/experimental Ansgar 🙀
• 2025/10/30 Re: Planned obsolescence ? Riccardo Mottola
• 2025/10/28 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green
• 2025/10/28 Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Klos
• 2025/10/28 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Diederik de Haas
• 2025/10/28 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Diederik de Haas
• 2025/10/28 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
• 2025/10/28 AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
• 2025/10/28 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
• 2025/10/28 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/10/28 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/10/28 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marc Haber
• 2025/10/28 Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
• 2025/10/28 Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Hermann . Lauer
• 2025/10/28 Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Romain Dolbeau
• 2025/10/28 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Kurt Roeckx
• 2025/10/28 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Sicelo
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Klos
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Milan Kupcevic
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky kiruthikaanbusuresh
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marcin Juszkiewicz
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Aurelien Jarno
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Gerardo Ballabio
• 2025/10/27 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/10/26 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
• 2025/10/26 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Simon Richter
• 2025/10/26 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
• 2025/10/26 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
• 2025/10/26 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marco d'Itri
• 2025/10/26 Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
• 2025/10/26 Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank
• 2025/10/18 Bug#1117486: telegram-desktop: Fails to build form source Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
• 2025/10/17 Bug#1117937: libcgns: test_particlef and cgwrite_f03 tests fail on many architectures Drew Parsons
• 2025/09/18 Re: OpenSSL on mips64el Jeffrey Walton
• 2025/09/18 OpenSSL on mips64el Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
• 2025/09/11 clang and linux headers on mips64el: /usr/include/mips64el-linux-gnuabi64/asm/byteorder.h:17:3: error: "MIPS, but neither __MIPSEB__, nor __MIPSEL__???" Simon Josefsson
• 2025/09/01 Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update) Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/08/25 Re: Bug#1109147: bookworm-pu: package libsoup3/3.2.3-0+deb12u2 Simon McVittie
• 2025/08/25 Re: Bug#1109147: bookworm-pu: package libsoup3/3.2.3-0+deb12u2 Simon McVittie
• 2025/08/25 Re: Bug#1109147: bookworm-pu: package libsoup3/3.2.3-0+deb12u1 Adam D. Barratt
• 2025/08/25 Re: Bug#1109147: bookworm-pu: package libsoup3/3.2.3-0+deb12u1 Simon McVittie
• 2025/08/24 Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update) Rob Landley
• 2025/08/23 Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update) Bastian Blank
• 2025/08/23 qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update) Thorsten Glaser
• 2025/08/22 Re: Bug#1105965: Remove mips64el from testing Sebastian Ramacher
• 2025/08/20 Bug#1111671: openarena-server: Dedicated server segfaults during startup on mips64el, riscv64, s390x Simon McVittie
• 2025/08/11 downgrading severity, no reply from the mips porters yet Matthias Klose
• 2025/08/11 Bug#1110684: RM: rust-tiny-dfr [armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; update only builds on arm64 and amd64 NoisyCoil
• 2025/08/11 Bug#1110684: RM: rust-tiny-dfr [armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; update only builds on arm64 and amd64 NoisyCoil
• 2025/08/09 Bug#1110684: RM: rust-tiny-dfr [armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; update only builds on arm64 and amd64 NoisyCoil
• 2025/05/18 Re: Difference between mips64el builders? Hilmar Preusse
• 2025/05/18 Bug#1105965: Remove mips64el from testing Sebastian Ramacher
• 2025/05/18 Re: Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: status of mips64el for trixie Paul Gevers
• 2025/05/16 Bug#1105913: RM: python-freecontact [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Not provided on 32bit architectures any more Andreas Tille
• 2025/05/16 Bug#1105912: RM: libfreecontact-perl [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Not provided on 32bit architectures any more Andreas Tille
• 2025/05/16 Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el Rafael Laboissière
• 2025/05/16 Re: Difference between mips64el builders? Aurelien Jarno
• 2025/05/15 Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el Rafael Laboissière
• 2025/05/15 Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el Aurelien Jarno
• 2025/05/13 Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el Rafael Laboissière
• 2025/05/12 Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el John W. Eaton
• 2025/05/12 Re: NA and NaN representation on mips64el YunQiang Su
• 2025/05/12 NA and NaN representation on mips64el Rafael Laboissière
• 2025/05/06 Bug#1104802: RM: freecontact [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Not provided on 32bit architectures any more Andreas Tille
• 2025/05/01 Re: Bug#1100544: reopening, c-t-b-mipsen is still unfixed Paul Gevers
• 2025/04/27 Re: MIPS Linux kernel versions for trixie/sid Thorsten Glaser
• 2025/04/25 MIPS Linux kernel versions for trixie/sid Thorsten Glaser
• 2025/04/23 Re: Bug#1103627: openjdk-20: Remove from Debian? Matthias Klose (Ubuntu)
• 2025/04/20 Re: Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el Sergio Durigan Junior
• 2025/04/19 Re: Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el Sergio Durigan Junior
• 2025/04/19 Re: Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el Sergio Durigan Junior
• 2025/04/19 Re: Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el Sergio Durigan Junior
• 2025/04/19 Re: Bug#1102299: patchelf: FTBFS on mips64el Chris Hofstaedtler
• 2025/04/19 Bug#1103585: RM: lomiri-docviewer-app [mips64el] -- RoQA; build-depends unavailable Chris Hofstaedtler
• 2025/04/12 Re: Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: status of mips64el for trixie Simon McVittie
• 2025/04/12 Re: go test SIGSEGV on mips64el for gitsign/0.13.0-1 Simon Josefsson
• 2025/04/11 Re: Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg needs resolving for trixie Sebastian Ramacher
• 2025/04/11 Re: go test SIGSEGV on mips64el for gitsign/0.13.0-1 Simon Josefsson
• 2025/04/11 go test SIGSEGV on mips64el for gitsign/0.13.0-1 Simon Josefsson
• 2025/04/08 Bug#1102418: RM: lloconv [mips64el] -- ANAIS; LibreOffice no longer built on mips64el Olly Betts
• 2025/04/07 Re: Bug#1102279: lib{,n}32atomic1 have an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib32/libatomic.so.1* Matthias Klose
• 2025/04/07 Bug#1102277: RM: endless-sky [mips64el] -- ROM; let it migrate to Trixie Alexandre Detiste
• 2025/04/06 boost1.88 also ftbfs on alpha, hppa, m68k, sh4. Matthias Klose
• 2025/04/06 Bug#1102196: boost1.88 unknown architectures Matthias Klose
• 2025/04/05 Re: src:libcap2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Christian Kastner
• 2025/04/05 Bug#1100904: src:libcap2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Paul Gevers
• 2025/04/05 Bug#1102007: RM: gitaly/experimental [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; replaced by gitaly-installer Pirate Praveen
• 2025/04/04 Bug#1102111: src:lomiri-docviewer-app: fails to migrate to testing for too long Paul Gevers
• 2025/04/02 Bug#1101954: RM: iitii [mips64el] -- RoQA; last revision of build dep not available Bastian Germann
• 2025/03/30 Bug#1101692: singularity-container: FTBFS on mips64el: cannot use stat.Dev (variable of type uint32) as uint64 value in struct literal Sebastian Ramacher
• 2025/03/23 Bug#1101103: RM: gitaly [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; it only build arch:all package Pirate Praveen
• 2025/03/05 Re: Please apply 8fa507083388 ("mm/memory: Use exception ip to search exception tables") (and one required dependency) to v6.1.y Greg Kroah-Hartman
• 2025/02/27 Bug#1099064: src:bfs: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Paul Gevers
• 2025/02/26 Please apply 8fa507083388 ("mm/memory: Use exception ip to search exception tables") (and one required dependency) to v6.1.y Salvatore Bonaccorso
• 2025/02/26 Re: Bug#1087809: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU Salvatore Bonaccorso
• 2025/02/26 Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU Sergei Golovan
• 2025/02/25 Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU Sergei Golovan
• 2025/02/25 Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU Salvatore Bonaccorso
• 2025/02/25 Re: mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds] Adrian Bunk
• 2025/02/21 Bug#1098511: RM: jnettop [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Does not build on (most) 32 bit architectures Andreas Tille
• 2025/02/20 Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU Salvatore Bonaccorso
• 2025/02/20 Bug#1098428: RM: angelfish [mips64el] -- ROM; It's stuck because the new version in unstable can't migrate because a dependency no longer build on a minor architecture. Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli
• 2025/02/20 Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU Jiaxun Yang
• 2025/02/19 Re: Bug#1086028: I've reproduced the bug in QEMU Salvatore Bonaccorso
• 2025/02/19 Bug#1098331: RM: genwqe-user [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Build issues on 32 bit architectures Andreas Tille
• 2025/02/16 Re: mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds] Sergei Golovan
• 2025/02/16 mips64el in trixie: [was: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds] Paul Gevers
• 2025/02/16 wabt mips64el ftbfs Jérémy Lal
• 2025/02/05 Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Sergei Golovan
• 2025/02/04 Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Sergei Golovan
• 2025/01/29 Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Uwe Kleine-König
• 2025/01/27 Re: Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg needs resolving for trixie Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093862: mame: FTBFS on mips64el: collect2: fatal error: cannot find ‘ld’ Simon McVittie
• 2025/01/23 Bug#1093859: release.debian.org: mips64el vs. librsvg needs resolving for trixie Simon McVittie
• 2025/01/22 Bug#1093752: coot: fix ftbfs on riscv64 and mips64el Bo YU
• 2025/01/19 Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Simon McVittie
• 2025/01/16 Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Shengjing Zhu
• 2025/01/16 Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Adrian Bunk
• 2025/01/16 Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Aurelien Jarno
• 2025/01/16 Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Matthias Geiger
• 2025/01/16 Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Aurelien Jarno
• 2025/01/16 Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Fabian Grünbichler
• 2025/01/16 Re: Bug#1093200: Some packages consistently FTBFS with EFAULT (Bad address) on most mips64el buildds Simon McVittie
• 2025/01/16 Re: Bug#1086028: loupe: FTBFS on mips64el: failed to acquire jobserver token: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
• 2025/01/16 Re: Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
• 2025/01/16 Bug#1093200: librsvg: FTBFS on mips64el: error: failed to acquire jobserver token; Caused by: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
• 2025/01/13 Re: Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure Nelson H. F. Beebe
• 2025/01/06 Re: Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure Mateusz Jończyk
• 2025/01/06 Re: Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure Mateusz Jończyk
• 2024/12/28 Source package quantlib-swig now fails on mips64el Dirk Eddelbuettel
• 2024/12/22 Bug#1091091: src:wings3d: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el Paul Gevers
• 2024/12/05 Debian 12.8 on QEMU MIPS64el: installation failure Nelson H. F. Beebe
• 2024/11/26 Re: Bug#1082751: nbdkit --help segfault from within printf() on mips64el: libc bug? Hilko Bengen
• 2024/11/25 Re: nbdkit --help segfault from within printf() on mips64el: libc bug? Petter Reinholdtsen
• 2024/11/24 nbdkit --help segfault from within printf() on mips64el: libc bug? Hilko Bengen
• 2024/11/23 Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1087809: cargo: [mipsel64] failed to acquire jobserver token/Bad address (os error 14) Fabian Grünbichler
• 2024/11/16 Differences between mips64 buildds? Ole Streicher
• 2024/11/15 Re: Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Matthew Vernon
• 2024/11/15 Re: Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Matthew Vernon
• 2024/11/15 Re: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Simon McVittie
• 2024/11/15 Re: Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Simon McVittie
• 2024/11/15 Bug#1087562: pcre2: FTBFS on mips64el: ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf Simon McVittie
• 2024/11/10 Bug#1087281: llvm-defaults: Please provide libomp5 and libomp-dev on riscv64 (and mips64el and loong64) Aurelien Jarno
• 2024/11/10 Bug#1087280: llvm-toolchain-19: Please re-enable OpenMP (without offloading) on riscv64 (and mips64el and loong64) Aurelien Jarno
• 2024/10/25 Re: Bug#1086028: loupe: FTBFS on mips64el: failed to acquire jobserver token: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
• 2024/10/25 Bug#1086028: loupe: FTBFS on mips64el: failed to acquire jobserver token: Bad address (os error 14) Simon McVittie
• 2024/09/18 Re: juce FTBFS on mips64el Andrius Merkys
• 2024/09/12 Re: Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS with weston 14: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display Simon McVittie
• 2024/09/12 Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS on -ports architectures: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display Simon McVittie
• 2024/09/10 Re: Bug#1081275: gtk4: gdk/memorytexture test failing in r16g16b16-float/ngl on mips64el only Simon McVittie
• 2024/09/10 Bug#1081275: gtk4: gdk/memorytexture test failing in r16g16b16-float/ngl on mips64el only Simon McVittie
• 2024/09/05 Re: gtk4: FTBFS on mips64el with Mesa 24.2.x: GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe no longer works Simon McVittie
• 2024/09/04 Bug#1080477: gtk4: FTBFS on mips64el with Mesa 24.2.x: GALLIUM_DRIVER=softpipe no longer works Simon McVittie
• 2024/09/04 Bug#1080457: LLVM 19 ftbfs with linker error Matthias Klose
• 2024/08/28 Re: Bug#1079515: bullseye-pu: package rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1 Adrian Bunk
• 2024/08/28 Re: Bug#1079515: bullseye-pu: package rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
• 2024/08/28 Re: Bug#1079515: bullseye-pu: package rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1 Adam D. Barratt
• 2024/08/28 Re: Bug#1079515: bullseye-pu: package rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort

• Earlier messages