On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:29:37PM +1000, Craig Southeren wrote: > On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:18:34 -0700 > Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you have successfully argued that we can satisfy this > > requirement of the license, and thus we could probably legally > > distribute MPLed software; however, distributability only gets you as > > far as the non-free archive. > > Given that the Debian definition of free basically means "GPL compatible", > I never really expected anything else :) GPL-compatible as in openssh and openssl? A number of other points were raised here. For instance, that in certain cases the MPL license would require you to change a specific file in the source-distribution itself (which kind of gets in the way of signed packages). Since this flame is only regarding the specific issue of keeping the source availble for one extra year, I gather that in all other points no difficulty was found? Regards -- Tzafrir Cohen sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq#16849755 iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
