On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 12:42:49 +0300 Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 07:29:37PM +1000, Craig Southeren wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 01:18:34 -0700 > > Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think you have successfully argued that we can satisfy this > > > requirement of the license, and thus we could probably legally > > > distribute MPLed software; however, distributability only gets you as > > > far as the non-free archive. > > > > Given that the Debian definition of free basically means "GPL compatible", > > I never really expected anything else :) > > GPL-compatible as in openssh and openssl? The modified BSD license is GPL compatible, isn't it? (I know the original BSD license isn't) > A number of other points were raised here. For instance, that in certain > cases the MPL license would require you to change a specific file in the > source-distribution itself (which kind of gets in the way of signed > packages). I think I missed that statement. Which file needs to be changed? ..deleted Craig ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Southeren Post Increment VoIP Consulting and Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.postincrement.com.au Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844 Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +61 417231046 "It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile. Be yourself, no matter what they say." Sting
