Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, please, write licenses for the audience at (3).
Isn't the GPL essentially a counterexample? It was written with legal counsel, and many people have criticised it for it complexity. It has also been an effective license that doesn't have any exploitable legal holes. It has prevented free-loading from even gargantuan corporations. If you were a small project, then I would recommend writing for (3), because someone with a lot of resources could just clone it. For large projects (which LaTeX certainly is), something more legalistic is important. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
