> > I've CC'ed this to a LaTeX person - any comments from the LaTeX crowd? > > I've removed the Cc again - Frank did read debian-legal the last time > the LPPL was discussed, so I assume he is still (or again) subscribed.
Frank is subscribed I think, I'm currently not but am reading the thread on the archive, but either way we are seeing all the messages. I think I'll refrain from commenting on specific points raised so far, but let the thread run a bit to get the general feel of the "Debian side" of the discussion. Since a major point of the exercise is to get a version of the LPPL that is accepted by all as compatible with DFSG I think it's clear that wording changes in problematical areas can (and most likely will) be made. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
