On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 12:03:59PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Clause 6 still doesn't come into play if the derived application is > > released under the QPL itself, in which case one has the choice of > > distributing under clauses 3 and 4 instead. > > > > This is no worse than a GPL'ed library (of which Debian does > > distribute a few). > > Ok, I think you're right. That means the QPL is not actually a > problem, even if you object to all forced publication requirements.
Can someone spell this out (again?) for my crippled mind? This might be good fodder for the FAQ. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Yeah, that's what Jesus would do. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Jesus would bomb Afghanistan. Yeah. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgp6ZQS9zqQxr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
