On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:40:23PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > You're not serious are you? Include "sanitize for undesirable comments", > > re-architect to avoid an insecure hack, setup, house, and buy bandwidth > > for http and mail servers for all these extra things because your core > > service doesn't support those non-features. > > I'm not in favor of the obligatory publishing clause.
Indeed, isn't that sort of clause the very reason we've refused to allow other software into Debian? In any case, I agree with you 100%. The existing GPL gets this right -- if you give binaries to anyone, you have to give them the source to -- and anyone you give any of the code to has to get the same rights under the GPL. Makes perfect sense to me. -- John
