Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes: > > But why should we bother trying to convince you anymore? What > > advantage is their? Why should we bother proving to you that our > > internal processes meet your tests of rationality? They suit us fine, > > and this is about what *we* choose to do, using the discretion > > available to us. > > Some people think there should be one and only one > definition/guideline/understanding of what comprises free software. > We've got one, you've got another, RMS has a third. Wouldn't it be a > good thing if there was less dissention in our community?
Sure. Why don't we adopt RMS's? That would be my first vote.
