Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes: > But why should we bother trying to convince you anymore? What > advantage is their? Why should we bother proving to you that our > internal processes meet your tests of rationality? They suit us fine, > and this is about what *we* choose to do, using the discretion > available to us.
Some people think there should be one and only one definition/guideline/understanding of what comprises free software. We've got one, you've got another, RMS has a third. Wouldn't it be a good thing if there was less dissention in our community? > We do what we do because we think it advances the cause of free > software and our users' interests, and not because someone from OSD > tries to tell us which software we should distribute. What's OSD? -- -russ nelson http://russnelson.com | A government does enough Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | wrong to offset what it 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | does right. Better that Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | it should do less.
