debian-legal  

Messages by Date

• 2016/03/11 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
• 2016/03/10 ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT
• 2016/03/09 WOMEN'SDAY Ce vendredi au Mas Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
• 2016/03/09 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ben Finney
• 2016/03/09 Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Riley Baird
• 2016/03/09 Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Tony Rutkowski
• 2016/03/09 Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Tony Rutkowski
• 2016/03/09 Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Ulrich Mueller
• 2016/03/09 Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Paul Wise
• 2016/03/09 Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Tony Rutkowski
• 2016/03/09 Re: libfcgi-perl copyright issue Paul Wise
• 2016/03/09 libfcgi-perl copyright issue Graham Knop
• 2016/03/08 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Tony Rutkowski
• 2016/03/08 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ben Finney
• 2016/03/08 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Rytis
• 2016/03/08 Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ? Don Armstrong
• 2016/03/07 Re: Can "PDB" license be considered free ? Bas Wijnen
• 2016/03/05 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Florian Weimer
• 2016/03/04 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
• 2016/03/03 Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Luca Filipozzi
• 2016/03/03 Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Georgi Guninski
• 2016/03/03 Re: According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Georgi Guninski
• 2016/03/03 Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Cord Beermann
• 2016/03/03 According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Georgi Guninski
• 2016/03/03 Re: [oss-security] According to www.virustotal.com, lists.debian.org are hosting attachment .DOC virus Adam D. Barratt
• 2016/02/29 Re: Missing changelog file Ben Finney
• 2016/02/29 Re: Re: Missing changelog file Rock Storm
• 2016/02/29 Re: Missing changelog file Ben Finney
• 2016/02/29 Missing changelog file Rock Storm
• 2016/02/28 Re: Code in lwIPv6 library under advertising requirement Francesco Poli
• 2016/02/28 Re: Code in lwIPv6 library under advertising requirement Riley Baird
• 2016/02/28 Code in lwIPv6 library under advertising requirement Ben Finney
• 2016/02/27 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Pamela Chestek
• 2016/02/27 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Jim Wright
• 2016/02/27 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Francesco Poli
• 2016/02/27 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Jim Wright
• 2016/02/27 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
• 2016/02/26 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Paul Wise
• 2016/02/26 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
• 2016/02/26 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
• 2016/02/26 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Zhu-Zhu Chin
• 2016/02/25 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Walter Landry
• 2016/02/25 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Zhu-Zhu Chin
• 2016/02/24 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Walter Landry
• 2016/02/24 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Walter Landry
• 2016/02/24 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
• 2016/02/24 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Paul Wise
• 2016/02/24 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
• 2016/02/24 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Zhu-Zhu Chin
• 2016/02/24 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Paul Wise
• 2016/02/23 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Walter Landry
• 2016/02/23 Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Nick Mathewson
• 2016/02/22 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
• 2016/02/22 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ian Jackson
• 2016/02/22 Re: "Personal" term in Apple license Alberto Luaces
• 2016/02/20 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
• 2016/02/19 Ordering Apparel for Your Gym in 2016? Request a Quote. Amelia Horton
• 2016/02/19 Re: "Personal" term in Apple license Riley Baird
• 2016/02/19 "Personal" term in Apple license Alberto Luaces
• 2016/02/19 Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
• 2016/02/18 Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Francesco Poli
• 2016/02/17 Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
• 2016/02/17 Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Francesco Poli
• 2016/02/17 Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
• 2016/02/17 Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
• 2016/02/16 Re: Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Francesco Poli
• 2016/02/13 New Artist Community Orfium Music
• 2016/02/10 Bug#814352: ITP: veracrypt -- Cross-platform on-the-fly encryption Mike Gabriel
• 2016/01/31 Re: ISA-L license Ben Finney
• 2016/01/31 ISA-L license Ondrej Novy
• 2016/01/29 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Andrew Shadura
• 2016/01/29 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Elmar Stellnberger
• 2016/01/29 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Anthony DeRobertis
• 2016/01/28 Recruiting Tony Pietrzak
• 2016/01/27 Pozvánka: Akadémia klasickej ekonómie 2016 Konzervatívny inštitút M . R . Štefánika
• 2016/01/23 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Charles Plessy
• 2016/01/23 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Francesco Poli
• 2016/01/22 Re: Please do not compound license proliferation (was: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org) Francesco Poli
• 2016/01/22 Re: Bug#805762: armory: Click-wrap dialogue appears on first use of package Joseph Bisch
• 2016/01/22 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Riley Baird
• 2016/01/21 Please do not compound license proliferation (was: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org) Ben Finney
• 2016/01/21 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org stressware2
• 2016/01/21 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Ángel González
• 2016/01/21 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org stressware2
• 2016/01/21 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Ángel González
• 2016/01/21 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Elmar Stellnberger
• 2016/01/21 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Elmar Stellnberger
• 2016/01/21 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Riley Baird
• 2016/01/21 Re: C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org jonathon
• 2016/01/21 C-FSL: a new license for software from elstel.org Elmar Stellnberger
• 2016/01/21 Soirée Célib' ce vendredi au Mas - Gratuit pour les femmes* + Menu du week end Le Mas - Puyricard
• 2016/01/20 Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Gunnar Wolf
• 2016/01/20 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ian Jackson
• 2016/01/20 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
• 2016/01/19 Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? stressware2
• 2016/01/19 Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Francesco Poli
• 2016/01/19 Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Walter Landry
• 2016/01/19 Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Riley Baird
• 2016/01/19 Re: Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Walter Landry
• 2016/01/19 Are these copyright notices compatible with GPLv2+? Guilherme Brondani Torri
• 2016/01/18 Re: Is an AGPL2 possible? Simon McVittie
• 2016/01/18 Is an AGPL2 possible? Jonathon Love
• 2016/01/17 Non-DFSG doc package "distributed in conjunction with"? Peter Pentchev
• 2016/01/15 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Paul R. Tagliamonte
• 2016/01/14 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Hendrik Weimer
• 2016/01/14 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Charles Plessy
• 2016/01/13 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Charles Plessy
• 2016/01/13 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Hendrik Weimer
• 2016/01/13 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
• 2016/01/11 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Paul Tagliamonte
• 2016/01/11 Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Rytis
• 2016/01/01 Re: SPIN license -- now BSD 3-Clause! Paul Wise
• 2016/01/01 Fwd: SPIN license -- now BSD 3-Clause! Tom Lee
• 2015/12/30 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
• 2015/12/25 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Osamu Aoki
• 2015/12/15 Creative Control. Custom Apparel. CreateMyTee Andrew Haseltine
• 2015/12/13 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
• 2015/12/12 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
• 2015/12/11 Votre programme du réveillon - Le Mas Le Mas - Puyricard
• 2015/12/09 Discussions on legal effects of distributing software in Debian (was: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms) Ben Finney
• 2015/12/09 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ian Jackson
• 2015/12/07 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Johan Van de Wauw
• 2015/12/07 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Johan Van de Wauw
• 2015/12/06 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ben Finney
• 2015/12/06 OGC work, license conditions (was: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms) Ben Finney
• 2015/12/06 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ben Finney
• 2015/12/06 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Walter Landry
• 2015/12/06 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ben Finney
• 2015/12/06 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Scott Simmons
• 2015/12/06 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Sebastiaan Couwenberg
• 2015/12/06 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Ben Finney
• 2015/12/06 Re: Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Walter Landry
• 2015/12/06 Establishing dialogue between the Debian project and OGC regarding Document & Software Notice terms Sebastiaan Couwenberg
• 2015/12/04 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Francesco Poli
• 2015/12/03 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
• 2015/12/01 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
• 2015/12/01 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Paul Tagliamonte
• 2015/11/30 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
• 2015/11/30 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Paul Tagliamonte
• 2015/11/30 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Paul Tagliamonte
• 2015/11/30 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Francesco Poli
• 2015/11/29 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
• 2015/11/29 Re: Non-Free SGML entity files Francesco Poli
• 2015/11/28 Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
• 2015/11/27 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Neil McGovern
• 2015/11/27 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ian Jackson
• 2015/11/27 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Lucas Nussbaum
• 2015/11/26 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
• 2015/11/26 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ángel González
• 2015/11/26 debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
• 2015/11/25 Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Ian Jackson
• 2015/11/24 Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Ben Finney
• 2015/11/24 Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Ian Jackson
• 2015/11/23 Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Florian Weimer
• 2015/11/21 Bug#805762: armory: Click-wrap dialogue appears on first use of package Riley Baird
• 2015/11/17 Re: Is mpage DFSG compatible? Eriberto
• 2015/11/16 Re: Is mpage DFSG compatible? Dmitry Alexandrov
• 2015/11/13 Non-Free SGML entity files stressware2
• 2015/11/11 Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Hideki Yamane
• 2015/11/11 Re: TPP 14.17 Paul Wise
• 2015/11/10 Re: CISST licence and DFSG Ian Jackson
• 2015/11/10 Re: CISST licence and DFSG MJ Ray
• 2015/11/09 Re: CISST licence and DFSG Riley Baird
• 2015/11/09 Re: CISST licence and DFSG Ben Finney
• 2015/11/09 Re: CISST licence and DFSG Ben Finney
• 2015/11/09 Re: CISST licence and DFSG Francesco Poli
• 2015/11/09 CISST licence and DFSG Jochen Sprickerhof
• 2015/11/08 Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Ben Finney
• 2015/11/07 Re: licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Mark Weyer
• 2015/11/07 licensed under GPL-2 but need to accept license dialog Hideki Yamane
• 2015/11/07 Happy weekend celidoli
• 2015/11/06 Re: TPP 14.17 Ben Finney
• 2015/11/06 Re: TPP 14.17 Glenn McGrath
• 2015/11/06 Re: TPP 14.17 Steve Langasek
• 2015/11/06 Re: TPP 14.17 Paul Wise
• 2015/11/06 Re: TPP 14.17 Glenn McGrath
• 2015/11/06 Re: TPP 14.17 Walter Landry
• 2015/11/06 TPP 14.17 Glenn McGrath
• 2015/11/05 Re: The future of copyleft Ben Finney
• 2015/11/05 Re: The future of copyleft (was: [A]GPL vs Apache 2) Ritesh Raj Sarraf
• 2015/11/04 Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Paul Wise
• 2015/11/04 Contact Center untuk Meningkatkan Performance Bisnis Perusahaan Anda Contact Center System Info
• 2015/11/03 The future of copyleft (was: [A]GPL vs Apache 2) Ben Finney
• 2015/11/03 Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Francesco Poli
• 2015/11/03 Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Ritesh Raj Sarraf
• 2015/11/02 Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Paul Wise
• 2015/11/02 Re: [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Riley Baird
• 2015/11/02 [A]GPL vs Apache 2 Ritesh Raj Sarraf
• 2015/11/01 Re: Status of CC-BY 3.0/4.0? Oleksandr Gavenko
• 2015/11/01 Re: Status of CC-BY 3.0/4.0? Paul Tagliamonte
• 2015/11/01 Re: Status of CC-BY 3.0/4.0? Paul Tagliamonte
• 2015/11/01 Status of CC-BY 3.0/4.0? Oleksandr Gavenko
• 2015/10/30 Re: Source files Riley Baird
• 2015/10/29 Re: non free broadcom-sta-dkms_6.30.223.248-3_all.deb for wireless driver bmc4313 Ángel González
• 2015/10/29 FOSDEM Legal and Policy Issues DevRoom CFP Paul Wise
• 2015/10/29 non free broadcom-sta-dkms_6.30.223.248-3_all.deb for wireless driver bmc4313 Gabriel Tachtatzis
• 2015/10/26 Re: Source files Francesco Poli
• 2015/10/26 Re: Licenses applicable to all packages include in Debian Wheezy 7.2.0 Stephen Kitt
• 2015/10/26 Licenses applicable to all packages include in Debian Wheezy 7.2.0 Mathieu AUZENET
• 2015/10/22 Re: Source files Riley Baird

• Earlier messages
• Later messages