debian-legal

Messages by Date

2016/10/04 Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Roberto
2016/10/04 Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Paul R. Tagliamonte
2016/10/04 Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Miriam Ruiz
2016/10/04 Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Paul Wise
2016/10/04 Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Yaroslav Halchenko
2016/10/04 Re: would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Paul Wise
2016/10/04 would this custom license considered DFSG-free/GPL-compatible Yaroslav Halchenko
2016/10/02 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Paul Wise
2016/10/02 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Florian Weimer
2016/09/25 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Eriberto Mota
2016/09/22 Re: Bug#838414: gpick: colors.txt is non-free Elías Alejandro
2016/09/21 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Charles Plessy
2016/09/21 Re: Bug#838414: gpick: colors.txt is non-free Ben Finney
2016/09/21 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Ben Finney
2016/09/21 Re: Bug#838414: gpick: colors.txt is non-free Elías Alejandro
2016/09/21 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Paul Wise
2016/09/21 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Eriberto Mota
2016/09/20 Re: EPL and GPL incompatibility Ángel González
2016/09/20 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Paul Wise
2016/09/20 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Ángel González
2016/09/20 Re: Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Ben Finney
2016/09/20 Re: your mail Steve Langasek
2016/09/20 Can "rockyou" wordlist be packaged in Debian? Eriberto Mota
2016/09/20 [no subject] Jennifer Nielsen
2016/09/14 Re: Bug#837666: Fwd: Bug#837666: udunits: license change Francesco Poli
2016/09/14 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Francesco Poli
2016/09/13 Re: Bug#837666: Fwd: Bug#837666: udunits: license change Ben Finney
2016/09/13 Fwd: Bug#837666: udunits: license change Alastair McKinstry
2016/09/12 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Paul Wise
2016/09/12 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Frederic Bonnard
2016/09/10 EPL and GPL incompatibility George Bateman
2016/09/09 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ian Jackson
2016/09/08 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ben Finney
2016/09/08 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ian Jackson
2016/09/08 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Frederic Bonnard
2016/09/07 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ben Finney
2016/09/07 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Francesco Poli
2016/09/07 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ian Jackson
2016/09/07 Re: [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Ole Streicher
2016/09/07 [Individual|Corporate] Contributor License Agreement Frederic Bonnard
2016/09/06 Re: declaring a license Herbert Fortes
2016/09/05 Re: declaring a license Ben Finney
2016/09/05 Re: declaring a license Ian Jackson
2016/09/05 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Ian Jackson
2016/09/04 declaring a license Herbert Fortes
2016/09/03 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Francesco Poli
2016/09/03 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Francesco Poli
2016/09/02 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Rafael Laboissière
2016/09/02 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Ben Finney
2016/09/02 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Rafael Laboissière
2016/09/01 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Ben Finney
2016/09/01 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Paul Wise
2016/09/01 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Charles Plessy
2016/09/01 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Walter Landry
2016/09/01 Re: Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Ian Jackson
2016/09/01 Inclusion of PDF with CC Attr 3.0 license Rafael Laboissière
2016/08/15 Re: Re: transformed external sources with untouched copyright in upstream source ball Jerome BENOIT
2016/08/14 Re: transformed external sources with untouched copyright in upstream source ball Paul Wise
2016/08/14 Re: transformed external sources with untouched copyright in upstream source ball Ben Finney
2016/08/14 transformed external sources with untouched copyright in upstream source ball Jerome BENOIT
2016/08/14 Pressage cd dvd promo distribution numérique !!! contact
2016/08/08 Re: Are there any stats of reasons given for rejections of package to the Package archive ? Charles Plessy
2016/08/08 Re: Are there any stats of reasons given for rejections of package to the Package archive ? Paul Wise
2016/08/08 Are there any stats of reasons given for rejections of package to the Package archive ? shirish शिरीष
2016/08/01 Re: sybase license and openWatcom DFSGness Francesco Poli
2016/08/01 Re: Re: sybase license and openWatcom DFSGness Gianfranco Costamagna
2016/07/28 Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
2016/07/28 Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
2016/07/28 Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
2016/07/28 Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
2016/07/28 Re: Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
2016/07/28 Re: Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
2016/07/28 Re: Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
2016/07/28 Re: [Pkg-julia-devel] Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
2016/07/28 Re: Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Josh Triplett
2016/07/28 Linking libgit2 to OpenSSL Peter Colberg
2016/07/27 Video Editing Software Product users list Len Rosario
2016/07/26 Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Servicos MaisReforma
2016/07/20 Seja um franqueado Fototica Fototica
2016/07/18 Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Servicos MaisReforma
2016/07/13 Re: EADL license Hendrik Weimer
2016/07/13 Re: "Use as you wish" license Paul Wise
2016/07/11 Receba Gratuitamente Orcamentos de Profissionais Avaliados Servicos MaisReforma
2016/07/06 Re: dvbackup package Herbert Fortes
2016/07/05 Dhrhd Seth Gonzales
2016/07/05 Dtydf Seth Gonzales
2016/07/05 Re: dvbackup package Cyril Brulebois
2016/07/05 Discussing legal issues of a code base, before official procedure (was: "Use as you wish" license) Ben Finney
2016/07/05 dvbackup package Herbert Fortes
2016/07/05 Re: "Use as you wish" license Roberto
2016/07/05 Re: "Use as you wish" license Ian Jackson
2016/07/05 Re: "Use as you wish" license Roberto
2016/07/05 Re: "Use as you wish" license Johannes Schauer
2016/07/05 Re: "Use as you wish" license Roberto
2016/07/04 Re: "Use as you wish" license Ben Finney
2016/07/04 Re: "Use as you wish" license Ian Jackson
2016/07/04 "Use as you wish" license Roberto
2016/06/28 Re: sct public domain Jacob Adams
2016/06/27 Re: sct public domain Ben Finney
2016/06/27 Re: sct public domain Ian Jackson
2016/06/26 Re: EADL license Walter Landry
2016/06/26 Re: sct public domain Jacob Adams
2016/06/26 Re: EADL license Florian Weimer
2016/06/24 Re: sct public domain Ian Jackson
2016/06/23 sct public domain Jacob Adams
2016/06/20 RE:EADL license PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
2016/06/20 Re: EADL license Walter Landry
2016/06/20 EADL license PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
2016/06/20 RE:NIST data licenses/copyright PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
2016/06/20 Re: NIST data licenses/copyright Ian Jackson
2016/06/20 NIST data licenses/copyright PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
2016/06/14 Oczerniają Cię w Internecie? Magdalena Cenckiewicz
2016/06/10 www.lists.debian.org Nicolas Grant | SunnySide Web Networks Pty Ltd
2016/06/09 Re: GPL with exclusive re-licensing exception (BSD3) Dmitry Alexandrov
2016/06/09 GPL with exclusive re-licensing exception (BSD3) Debian/GNU
2016/06/06 Re: Bug#826379: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Dmitry Alexandrov
2016/06/06 Re: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Tobias Frost
2016/06/05 Re: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Alexander Gerasiov
2016/06/04 Re: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Vincent Cheng
2016/05/31 Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's Paul Wise
2016/05/31 Re: Is possible relicense from GPL to BSD? Eriberto Mota
2016/05/31 Re: Is possible relicense from GPL to BSD? Charles Plessy
2016/05/31 Is possible relicense from GPL to BSD? Eriberto Mota
2016/05/31 Re: png files hpfn
2016/05/31 Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's Jan Luca Naumann
2016/05/31 Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's Riley Baird
2016/05/31 Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's Jan Luca Naumann
2016/05/31 Re: Maintaining of CodeBlocks Alexander Gerasiov
2016/05/29 Re: png files Paul Wise
2016/05/29 Re: png files Ben Finney
2016/05/29 png files hpfn
2016/05/26 Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time vheuser
2016/05/26 Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time Ben Finney
2016/05/26 Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time Eloi
2016/05/24 Re: Legal issues with haskell-unix-time Paul Wise
2016/05/24 Legal issues with haskell-unix-time Dmitry Bogatov
2016/05/13 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Jim Wright
2016/05/13 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
2016/05/06 Non-Free SGML entity files stressware
2016/04/22 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
2016/04/15 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status William Whyte
2016/04/07 Votre RDV du week-end Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
2016/03/30 Votre RDV du week-end Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
2016/03/27 Re: Re: Global IP Sound iLBC Public License, v2.0 - IETF Version Paul R. Tagliamonte
2016/03/27 Re: Re: Global IP Sound iLBC Public License, v2.0 - IETF Version Kim Paflias
2016/03/24 Votre RDV du week-end Le Mas - 06 65 039 239
2016/03/23 Re: detail about license in duc package hpfn
2016/03/22 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Charles Plessy
2016/03/22 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
2016/03/22 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
2016/03/22 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
2016/03/22 Re: detail about license in duc package Ben Finney
2016/03/22 Re: detail about license in duc package Walter Landry
2016/03/22 detail about license in duc package hpfn
2016/03/22 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
2016/03/21 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
2016/03/21 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
2016/03/20 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself, Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
2016/03/20 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Ben Finney
2016/03/20 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ben Finney
2016/03/20 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
2016/03/20 Re: R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Paul R. Tagliamonte
2016/03/20 R packages licensed MIT but not shipping a copy of the MIT license itself Mattia Rizzolo
2016/03/19 Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Ian Jackson
2016/03/19 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
2016/03/19 Missing license text in upstream packages Sven Bartscher
2016/03/19 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ben Finney
2016/03/19 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ian Jackson
2016/03/19 Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Riley Baird
2016/03/19 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] [Apache 2.0] Jerome BENOIT
2016/03/19 Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Sven Bartscher
2016/03/19 Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Sven Bartscher
2016/03/19 Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Ian Jackson
2016/03/19 Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Ben Finney
2016/03/19 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] [Apache 2.0] Ben Finney
2016/03/19 Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Charles Plessy
2016/03/18 Re: Missing license text in upstream packages Riley Baird
2016/03/18 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ian Jackson
2016/03/15 Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status Ian Jackson
2016/03/15 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ian Jackson
2016/03/15 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ian Jackson
2016/03/15 Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries Ian Jackson
2016/03/13 Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl extensions Ferenc Kovacs
2016/03/12 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] Ben Finney
2016/03/12 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? [IMPROVED VERSION] Jerome BENOIT
2016/03/12 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
2016/03/12 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT
2016/03/12 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
2016/03/12 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Thorsten Alteholz
2016/03/12 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Tony Rutkowski
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Charles Plessy
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Ben Finney
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Riley Baird
2016/03/11 Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ? Jerome BENOIT