Am 14.12.2012 15:19, schrieb Roland Stigge: >> but this one doesn't look for the v1/v0 distinction and uses the same >> multiarch >> tuple for both. Please bring it in a form which can go upstream. > > In your other mail you wrote about tm_file being replaced by > tm_file_list. Should I assume that tm_file (which includes e500-double.h > by which the distinction of v1 is made) is included into tm_file_list > somehow (what I currently can't see), or should we patch > src/gcc/config.gcc to include e500-double.h into tm_file_list instead of > tm_file?
I don't know the powerpcspe target that well. Adding a header looks wrong. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50cb382c.1050...@debian.org
