Am 14.12.2012 14:34, schrieb Roland Stigge: > On 14/12/12 14:10, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Am 12.12.2012 13:26, schrieb Roland Stigge: >>> regarding your request to use t-spe, I'm attaching two patches, for the >>> unstable and experimental versions of gcc-4.7, respectively. >>> >>> As written before, in Debian, t-spe wasn't included properly (only on >>> some bsd variant). So doing it instead of t-linux in the powerpcspe >>> case, when spe is present. >> >> is this wanted, e.g. defining all the MULTILIB macros? > > No, not necessary. > >> then better add the t-spe bits to the t-linux file. > > Fine with that. That's actually what my very first patch did that I > submitted with this report. So please take it. :-)
but this one doesn't look for the v1/v0 distinction and uses the same multiarch tuple for both. Please bring it in a form which can go upstream. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50cb2e52.70...@debian.org
