On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 15:32, Matthias Klose wrote: > Nathanael Nerode writes: > > Looking at the 'update_excuses' and buildd logs, it seems the most > > recent version of gcc-3.2 isn't building on ARM. It's failing after a > > veeeeeerry long command line which appears to have improperly embedded > > carriage returns in it (though that could be an artifact of the > > logging). That's as far as I could get without an ARM to work on. > > This is gonna keep the newest gcc-3.2 out of testing; anyone > > looking at it? > > I hope Phil will be looking at this. We should not take care of testing at > this point. some architectures don't even have glibc-2.3.1 at the moment.
Yes, I'm on the case. I'm also trying to debug the bootstrap failure with gcc-snapshot. p.
