Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2001 01:40:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 08 20:40:55 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from x8b4e531b.dhcp.okstate.edu (dvdeug) [139.78.83.27] (foobar)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14mQfn-0004Au-00; Sun, 08 Apr 2001 20:40:55 -0500
Received: from dvdeug by dvdeug with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14mQe4-0000Hp-00; Sun, 08 Apr 2001 20:39:08 -0500
From: David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: README.Bugs.gz is gratitiously Latin-1; should be ASCII
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 20:39:08 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-3.0-base
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010403
Severity: wishlist
The section quoting the standard part 4.4/4 uses the soft hyphen at
several places. Why, I don't understand; it seems like a hyphen is
called for, not the ambigiously non-graphic soft hyphen. However,
not all character sets have a soft hyphen at <AD>, and most
multibyte sets don't accept it as valid at all. Since it adds no
real value over just using the hyphen, it would be nice to change
all the soft hyphens to hyphens and get an ASCII document.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dvdeug 2.4.0 #9 Thu Feb 22 01:11:46 CST 2001 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 93343-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:10:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 27 17:10:17 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1548jm-0005Ir-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:10:14 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03363;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01795;
Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:08:35 +0200 (MEST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed bugs in gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526)
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010526) unstable; urgency=high
* Urgency "high" for replacing the gcc-3.0 snapshots in testing, which
now are incompatile due to the changed ABIs.
* Upstream begins tagging with "gcc-3_0_pre_2001mmdd".
* Tighten dependencies to install only binary packages derived from
one source (#98851). Tighten libc6-dev dependency to match libc6.
gcc-3.0 (3.0.ds6-0pre010525) unstable; urgency=low
* ATTENTION: The ABI (exception handling) changed. No upgrade path from
earlier snapshots (you had been warned in the postinst ...)
Closing #93597, #94576, #96448, #96461.
You have to rebuild
* HELP is appreciated for scanning the Debian BTS and sending followups
to bug reports!!!
* Should we name debian gcc uploads? What about a "still seeking
g++ maintainer" upload?
* Fixed in gcc-3.0: #97030
* Update patches for recent (010525) CVS sources.
* Make check depend on build target (fakeroot problmes).
* debian/rules.d/binary-libgcc.mk: new file, build first.
* Free memory detection on the hurd for running the testsuite.
* Update debhelper build dependency.
* libstdc++-doc: Include doxygen generated docs.
* Fix boring packaging bugs, too tired for appropriate changelogs ...
#93343, #96348, #96262, #97134, #97905, #96451, #95812, #93157
* Fixed bugs: #87000.
