Hi David, David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> writes:
> Xiyue Deng <manp...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Source: racket-mode >> Version: 20240129git0 >> Severity: important >> >> When working on updating the racket-mode package, I noticed that the >> Debian packaging work under "debian/" does not have a separate copyright >> clause. This is probably fine. However, upstream has updated their >> license from GPL-2+ to GPL-3+ in 2022, and hence we need some >> clarification of the license for the work under "debian/". >> >> I think the majority of the packaging work is done by David, so it would >> be great that David can help clarify the license of your work under >> "debian/", and whether you want to follow upstream to update it to >> GPL-3+. >> >> (A similar bug was filed against web-mode as Bug#1074413[1], which can >> be used as an example on providing consent as reference.) >> > > Yes, it's fine to follow upstream. I usually write that explicitly in > d/copyright, but here it seems I neglected to do so. Please feel free to > license the existing packaging as "same as upstream". This level of > indirection will reduce future updates. Thanks for the clarification! I have added the copyright clause accordingly. Will submit an RFS for review. -- Regards, Xiyue Deng
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
