Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Wed, Mar 15, Miles Bader wrote: >>> In practice I guess it's just going to mean that most people end up >>> putting non-free in their sources.list, weakening the effect of having a >>> separation between "free" and "non-free" in the first place, and more >>> users end up confused because lack of hard dependencies will mean the >>> doc packages don't get installed. >> >> It may get worse. The maintainer of the GNU make package has just kicked >> out the documentation for good, offering no substituton >> whatsoever. [...] > > Why should a Debian maintainer feel compelled to package non-free > software?
Why should he feel compelled to package anything at all? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
