Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure why everyone is reacting to the Emacs Manual removal as if > it's something new. The release team has, since before sarge was > released, said that GFDLed documentation would be removed in > sarge+1=etch.
Personally I thought people would come to their senses if they flamed each other long enough... but I guess not. In practice I guess it's just going to mean that most people end up putting non-free in their sources.list, weakening the effect of having a separation between "free" and "non-free" in the first place, and more users end up confused because lack of hard dependencies will mean the doc packages don't get installed. -miles -- Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
