On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:56:11 +0100 Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, following both XEmacs and Emacs development lists, > it seems to me that XEmacs is not doing much progress these > days, especially because of a lack of manpower. > On the contrary, the GNU Emacs teem is very productive and > Emacs is not only catching up (multi tty) but also brings nice new > features like bidirectional editing, nifty gtk2 widgets, > configurable fringes, and so. > > That said, both are nice tools. Talking about GNU Emacs and XEmacs lately ... I am playing in my mind with switching from Woody do Gentoo ... but as far as I understood Gentoo provides only XEmacs ... and since I am used to GNU Emacs ... well, is it a huge step switching from Xmacs to Xmacs? I fairly seldom use the mouse so I am used to use the short cuts ... any comments? I would be glad to listen. ray
