Quoting Uwe Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > is very productive and Emacs is not only catching up (multi tty) but > > also brings nice new features like bidirectional editing, nifty gtk2 > > widgets, configurable fringes, and so. > > That is true, the lack of BIDI support is especially annoying, however > some years ago there was a conference about this issue and people > working in BIDI were not willing to do anything for Xemacs. It is too bad. > > I forget to add one important thing of course, the Xemacs package > system which allows on the fly actualization. Emacs has nothing similar
