Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:36:26PM +0100, Uwe Brauer wrote: >> Very true, I mentioned some oddies and also propose to sync with offical >> xemacs release politics, ie stable should be 21.4.x and testing 21.5.x. > > I don't use xemacs, but that doesn't make much sense -- you can't choose > different versions for stable/testing like that (and even if some override > mechanism exists, there seems no good reason to do so in this case). You > just put whatever version seems a good choice into unstable, and if it's > bug-free enough, it'll become the version in testing, and thence at some > point the version in stable.
BTW, Miles, I have prepared a package dedicated at Emacs CVS snapshots. What distribution do you think it would fit the best?: - unstable - experimental - none of the above, a stagging area would be better Please note that I intend to provide a debian branch from your tla archive. Thanks, -- J閞鬽e Marant http://marant.org
