Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not a great fan of orphaning complicated packages. Are there users > that need emacs20 because emacs21 is broken for some things? If not, > and there's no real reason for emacs20, I'd suggest that you offer it up > for adoption but don't orphan it. If there are no takers within 1 month > or so, then pull the package from the archive. That's what I tend to do > anyway, instead of orphaning.
Ahh, right. I didn't think about the fact that I could actually explicitly have it removed. That may be a better idea. I'll think about it for a little bit, and then I guess I'll post something to debian-devel once I know what I want to do. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
