On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:44:42 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:15:52AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> I am not a native speaker, but to me it looks like your message >> doesn't fit the questions I asked. > >Steve answered your first question. The second question makes no sense, >since policy-rc.d is supposed to be written by the administrator to fit >their local policy.
So policy-rc.d needs to be in /usr/local, or we have a FHS violation. Additionally, the requirement of going through the alternatives system for policy-rc.d selection is somewhat mis-placed, because it suggests to me that policy-rc.d is meant to come in via package as well. Can somebody please enlighten me? Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
