On 17692 March 1977, M. Zhou wrote:
> So any previous FTPMaster delegation is still in force, as it did
> not get
> revoked? And we do not have any policy delegation anymore, as none
> was listed?
> Or asked differently: How strict do we go with words in those
> entirely formal
> delegation mails? We all know what is meant, for sure, but does
> that count?
This is the third or fourth time this has happened with the Policy
delegation!
I'm lost here since I have no context about this topic.
There is no context.
It sounds like either the delegation announcement needs an errata, or
there is
some problem in the delegation execution in practice. None of them
sounds minor.
It is "just" a copy paste editor. DPL wanted to withdraw the old
FTPMaster delegation. When we strictly follow the words he used he
withdraw the policy delegation instead, while leaving the old FTPMaster
one active.
--
bye, Joerg
