Hello, On Wed 20 Aug 2025 at 04:41pm -04, M. Zhou wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-08-20 at 18:22 +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Wed 20 Aug 2025 at 05:17pm +02, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> >> > On 17690 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote: >> > >> > > Any previous Debian Policy delegation not explicitly listed above is >> > > revoked. The delegation is not time-limited and will be effective until >> > > further changes by present or future Project Leaders. >> > >> > So any previous FTPMaster delegation is still in force, as it did not get >> > revoked? And we do not have any policy delegation anymore, as none was >> > listed? >> > >> > Or asked differently: How strict do we go with words in those entirely >> > formal >> > delegation mails? We all know what is meant, for sure, but does that count? >> >> This is the third or fourth time this has happened with the Policy >> delegation! > > I'm lost here since I have no context about this topic. > But does that mean the practice is not consistent with the official > announcement? > > It sounds like either the delegation announcement needs an errata, or there is > some problem in the delegation execution in practice. None of them sounds > minor. I think it's just a repeated copy&paste error, that's all. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
