Quoting Holger Levsen (2025-05-07 18:59:27) > On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 05:42:39PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Since you asked: I respectfully find ITN a very bad idea. > > +1 > > > ITS is a process where you intend to take over responsibility. > > > > ITN is a process where you intend to put pressure on the existing > > maintainer for changing their way of doing *their* maintenance. > > > > If I am mistaken and ITN is only mild one-off contributions same a NMUs > > then I fail to see a reason for simply doing a 21-day-delayed NMU. > > an 21-delayed NMU would also be inappropriate because we don't change the > vcs in an NMU, however delayed.
*mild one-off contributions* obviously do not involve changes to vcs! My point is: Either do a 21-day NMU (by established rules of NMUs, not expanding them) or admit that your aim is to impose peer pressure - i.e. don't disguise it as related to an NMU but call it something more telling like NMD - Non-Maintainer Demand. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
