Quoting Andreas Tille (2025-05-07 17:16:07) > I fully agree that any deviation from our established NMU practices > should be discussed and, ideally, based on shared understanding. I plan > to bring a concrete proposal to the relevant lists in the near future. > In the meantime, feedback and concerns are very welcome--particularly > from those with experience in NMUs, low-maintenance packages, and > collaborative workflows.
Since you asked: I respectfully find ITN a very bad idea. ITS is a process where you intend to take over responsibility. ITN is a process where you intend to put pressure on the existing maintainer for changing their way of doing *their* maintenance. If I am mistaken and ITN is only mild one-off contributions same a NMUs then I fail to see a reason for simply doing a 21-day-delayed NMU. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
